WD doesn`t use disks with Linux - was Re: Re:Western Digital GreenPower drives and Linux
From: Roland
Date: Tue May 13 2008 - 17:01:00 EST
BTW, WD's tech support has gone silent so chances for an easier solution
are not so great.
Tvrtko
I`ve got a real funky response from WD support today, i`d like to share
here.
This is just too weird....
After asking if they could give a comment if the problem with the high
Load_Cycle_Count may be an issue of their drives or an issue of Linux i got:
------
Dear......
The problem is, that we actually don`t use the disks with Linux. I´m sorry
that i cannot send further information to you.
Sincery yours
<insert support employee name here>
Western Digital Service and Support
------
(translated from german)
So, WD sells enterprise SATA disks, optimizied for 24/7 & Raid array usage,
but they don`t seem to actually test them with Linux or at least are not
able to "support" Linux usage.......
Ridicuous!
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Western Digital GreenPower drives and Linux
From: "Tvrtko A. Ursulin" <tvrtko () ursulin ! net>
Date: 2008-04-09 20:18:35
Message-ID: 200804092118.35501.tvrtko () ursulin ! net
[Download message RAW]
Hi all,
The subject may be a bit misleading since I haven't investigated the whole
issue under other OS-es (nor do I plan to), but this is how the story
goes..
Those fancy new WD GreenPower drives seem to be heavily suffering from the
rapidly increasing head load/unload problem. And the bad thing is they
don't
respond to 'hdparm -B', which would mean (I think) their power management
behaviour is solely up to their firmware.
I got one of them (WD5000AACS) recently and to my horror after less than
three
days of being power on this is what I saw:
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 66
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 197 197 000 Old_age Always - 10233
At this rate the disk would reach it's design limit for load/unload cycles
in
around 80 days. Not good - so I implemented a lame workaround of keeping
disk
busy every couple of seconds - hopefully that won't kill it sooner that
unloads would..
I am also currently talking with first line of WD's tech support trying to
get
some data on how exactly those drives manage head unloading, but that may
not
lead anywhere useful.
So in parallel I decided to ask here to see if someone knows something
about
this?
If it matters, I am running vanilla 2.6.24 on that box and sata_sil is
driving
that disk. Otherwise it is a pretty basic Ubuntu 7.10, a mix of ext3 and
jfs
filesystems, all mounted with noatime. More detailed information available
on
request.
Tvrtko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/