Re: 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ISA DMA broken (bisected)

From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Wed May 14 2008 - 09:01:37 EST


At Wed, 14 May 2008 14:46:44 +0200,
Rene Herman wrote:
>
> On 14-05-08 01:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 13 May 2008 11:33:25 am Rene Herman wrote:
>
> >> No, isa_device is its own thing, on its own isa_bus (*). It has a struct
> >> device * readily available though...
> >>
> >> (*) drivers/base/isa.c, and explanatory changelog at:
> >>
> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=a5117ba7da37deb09df5eb802dace229b3fb1e9f
> >
> > Thanks for the nice changelog.
> >
> > isa_register_driver() currently doesn't set a DMA mask. Should it?
>
> If it's going to be useful, definitely. The attached does not just set
>
> dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask
>
> as in the fallback_dev when dma_alloc_coherent() is passed a NULL device
> only due to the mask juggling in snd_dma_hack_alloc_coherent() (which
> wouldn't break, but...) but introduces its own copy in struct isa_dev
> same as struct pnp_dev. As far as I'm aware, there's no actual reason
> for keeping it other than that and if the hack could go I'd rather lose
> the private mask copy again also.

The snd_dma_hack_alloc_coherent() is gone in the latest ALSA tree.
It wasn't merged to 2.6.26, though.


> (the device model still uses a plain u64 by the way but I guess the
> clean type would be a dma64_addr_t)
>
> Inlining is whitespace-failing here. Patch itself is trivial...
>
> > I only see about 35 dma_alloc_coherent() calls that pass NULL. I
> > guess even those would be a fair amount of work to change, and I
> > suppose there would be more that I missed.
>
> At least the ALSA one isn't passing a literal NULL it seems. But yes,
> current NULL-hack reinstatement (it's been merged by Linus already) is
> definitely the correct fix for now.

Yes. We need to fix the caller of snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pages*()
under sound/isa. Currently it's called with snd_dma_isa_data(), which
is expanded to NULL. Replace it with a proper device pointer should
suffice.


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/