Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Sat May 17 2008 - 01:34:43 EST
On Friday 16 May 2008 23:41:16 Mike Travis wrote:
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Rusty Russell a Ã©crit :
> >> Any chance I can ask you look at the issue of full dynamic per-cpu
> >> allocation?
> > You mean using alloc_percpu() ? Problem is that current implementation
> > is expensive,
I mean rewriting alloc_percpu :)
> > We probably can change this to dynamic per-cpu as soon as Mike or
> > Christopher finish their work on new dynamic per-cpu implementation ?
> Yes, the zero-based percpu variables followed by the cpu_alloc patch should
> provide this and shrink the code quite well, including in some cases
> removing locking requirements (because the resultant instructions will be
Ah, I hadn't realized that Mike was already working on this. Mike, have you
published patches already?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/