Re: [PATCH 3/3] posix timers: use SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED when the timeris destroyed

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sun, 18 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> So the rule is that if one bit of a word needs locking, then they *all* 
> do.

Side note: the alternative, of course, is to just use the atomic bit 
operations. They aren't generally much (if at all) faster than locking + 
doing the operation + unlocking, but they can avoid lock contention, so 
if you do a lot of bit ops that need no other locking than the setting and 
clearing (possibly with testing), then they are the right choice.

For signals, we obviously need other locking, so the atomic bit ops are a 
waste of time (doing *both* locking for other reasons *and* atomic bitops 
is obviously much slower than either).

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/