Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I'll leave it to you and Linus whether your way of defining PTE_MASK is
> satisfactory as is, or needs to be improved to his way.  I've not tried
> his suggestion of doing the _PAGE_BIT definitions: certainly it's
> seemed odd to me that they were defined with L, but I've little
> appetite to mess around with them now myself.
>   

Yes, well, that was me too, with the intention of making ~_PAGE_FOO 
generate an appropriately sized mask.  I guess it would be better to use 
pteval_t these days.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/