On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Soumyadip Das Mahapatra
Thanks for giving a reply Akinobu :-)
I forgot that bitrev8() is static in header file. Sorry for that.
Below is my new patch considering this. Cant it be applicable?
Please review it.
I know that my bitrev8() takes more instructions than that
of yours. But we have to think about faster access of cpu cache over that
of memory cache(which your bit_rev_table uses).
I didn't review your patch, sorry.
But I'm pretty sure that your patch won't be considered unless you
with numbers for different CPU/architecture.
Ideally you should provide a script to test the correctness and the
performance of your
change that anyone could run on his computer.