Re: [PATCH] PCI: boot parameter to avoid expansion ROM memory allocation
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Tue May 20 2008 - 16:16:48 EST
On Tuesday, May 20, 2008 1:00 pm Gary Hade wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:57:49AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:20 am Gary Hade wrote:
> > > > Correct, not a perfect solution but better than we have right now.
> > >
> > > ...but don't let this comment make you think that I am not in
> > > favor of something like you are suggesting. I am interested
> > > in getting the 'pci=norom' change into mainline quickly but it
> > > is obviously less than ideal for the long term.
> > >
> > > Jesse, any idea how many different devices absolutely need
> > > memory allocated for their expansion ROMs?
> > Unless there's a ton of demand, I'd rather go with the norom option, but
> > either way, I'd like to push the fix early in the 2.6.27 cycle rather
> > than trying to get it into 2.6.26 at the last minute...
> This is fine. I would also like to see the pci=norom option
> added as-is with the thought that we may improve later by either
> modifying pci=norom to exclude devices that need memory mapped
> to their expansion ROMs or by adding another option (pci=minrom ?)
> that would do the same thing.
> > So assuming you're ok with your last patch, I'll stuff it into
> > linux-next.
> Works for me. Thanks.
Ok, just pushed the norom patch to linux-next. I'll test it out, but it would
be good if you could try the tree out out on one of the problem machines too.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/