Re: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue May 20 2008 - 19:35:33 EST
> My concern is that the new API as long lived is ugly and not the right
> thing. I assume Linus and others have similar concerns, and weigh that
> over the "some obscure out of tree driver might break".
What do you find ugly exactly? The prefix "unlocked_" ? Other than
that there is no difference.
Duplicated entry points are not great, but they will be going away.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/