Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?
From: Rene Herman
Date: Wed May 21 2008 - 19:50:49 EST
On 22-05-08 01:37, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Speaking as a former OSS driver maintainer, I always preferred
Though Rene's suggestion (use both sound/ and drivers/sound/) might make
sense if the subsystem code is huge -- I supported the drivers/block/ ->
block/ code movement for example.
Well, not _huge_ but ALSA is very much structured like that; large
middle layer with "miniport" drivers (I do by the way expect this was
also Takashi plan originally due to him using sound/* and not just
"sound/"; that is, I took the * to be shorthand for isa, pci, usb and so on)
From a structural view, the PCM core is just as much not a driver as
the IP protocol isn't one and moving all of sound/ to drivers/ would
trade the current "why are the drivers not under drivers/?" issue for a
"why is all this non-driver code under drivers/?".
This "net model" of sound/ and drivers/sound/ would be cleanest I feel.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/