[PATCH] rio100: Push down the BKL

From: Alan Cox
Date: Thu May 22 2008 - 18:00:19 EST


The BKL is actually probably not needed as the mutex seems sufficient. If
so then a further patch to drop it would be a good followup.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/rio500.c b/drivers/usb/misc/rio500.c
index 330c18e..248a12a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/misc/rio500.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/misc/rio500.c
@@ -104,9 +104,7 @@ static int close_rio(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
return 0;
}

-static int
-ioctl_rio(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
- unsigned long arg)
+static long ioctl_rio(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
struct RioCommand rio_cmd;
struct rio_usb_data *rio = &rio_instance;
@@ -116,6 +114,7 @@ ioctl_rio(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
int retries;
int retval=0;

+ lock_kernel();
mutex_lock(&(rio->lock));
/* Sanity check to make sure rio is connected, powered, etc */
if (rio->present == 0 || rio->rio_dev == NULL) {
@@ -254,6 +253,7 @@ ioctl_rio(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,

err_out:
mutex_unlock(&(rio->lock));
+ unlock_kernel();
return retval;
}

@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ file_operations usb_rio_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.read = read_rio,
.write = write_rio,
- .ioctl = ioctl_rio,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = ioctl_rio,
.open = open_rio,
.release = close_rio,
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/