Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem

[Geoff Levand]

Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600
> Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely  
>> handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc?
>> 
>> I ask for two reasons:
>> 1. should we make it mutually exclusive in Kconfig
>> 2. I've enabled both and get (we'll my defconfig did):
> 
>  They shouldn't be enabled at once. I think a patch 
>  for Kconfig has been recently submitted to give a warning
>  in such a case.
> 
>  rtc-cmos should be able to handle the vast majority of x86
>  rtcs out there. 

gen_rtc was hooked up to the powerpc platform
ppc_md.set_rtc_time and ppc_md.get_rtc_time via the arch
specific get_rtc_time() and  set_rtc_time() routines.

>From what I can tell, those generic rtc routines the powerpc
arch provides are not properly hooked into the new rtc subsystem.
This causes problems for multi-platform builds where some platforms
must use gen_rtc, and some must the new rtc subsytem.

-Geoff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/