Re: [PATCH] libata: Handle bay devices in dock stations

From: Holger Macht
Date: Sun Jun 01 2008 - 12:03:47 EST


On Fri 30. May - 13:07:39, tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Quoting Holger Macht <hmacht@xxxxxxx>:
>
>> * Differentiate between bay devices in dock stations and others:
>>
>> - When an ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST appears, just signal uevent to
>> userspace (that is when the optional eject button on a bay device is
>> pressed/pulled) giving the possibility to unmount file systems and to
>> clean up. Also, only send uevent in case we get an EJECT_REQUEST
>> without doing anything else. In other cases, you'll get an add/remove
>> event because libata attaches/detaches the device.
>>
>> - In case of a dock event, which in turn signals an
>> ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST, immediately detach the device, because it
>> may already have been gone
>>
>> * In case of an ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE/BUS_CHECK, evaluate _STA to check if
>> the device has been plugged or unplugged. If plugged, hotplug it, if
>> unplugged, just signal event to userspace
>> (initial patch by Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
>>
>> * Call ACPI _EJ0 for detached devices
>
> Will this patch or the other bay/dock related patches you send in the past
> days allow me to undock my laptop and still be able to suspend/resume
> without locking the laptop up? And without having to run any userspace
> scripts?
>
> My dock is not a simple port replicator, it has an USB hub and an ATA bay
> in it. My tests showed that I need to 'echo 1 > /sys/.../scsi/.../eject' or
> something like that before I can take the laptop out of the docking
> station. If I don't do that and try to access the cdrom in the bay (or even
> rescaning the scsi bus) after I have taken the laptop out of the dock it
> results in a hard lockup. That in itself would not be a problem, because
> it's just a simple command that I can do in an acpid script. But far worse
> is that even if I do that, the computer locks up when I resume from
> suspend. I run 2.6.24.7 which locks up every time I resume. In recent
> versions from git it has somehow improved, there are situations where it
> doesn't lock up, but there are still a few left where it does (I don't
> remember the exact actions/commands I have to take).

Which kernel versions did you already try? But yes, those patches will
most likely help. But not sure about the resume issues...

Regards,
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/