Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Mon Jun 02 2008 - 07:58:16 EST


Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

+ /* Get the current pte state, but zero it out to make it
+ non-present, preventing the hardware from asynchronously
+ updating it. */

please use standard and consistent comment style, similar to:

OK.

J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/