Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask()and update_nodemask()

[Li Zefan]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800
> Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be
>> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE
>> offline/online.
> 
> Unfortunately this patch conflicts with
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch
> 
> Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense.  ie: that
> we did not revert the effects of that bugfix.
> 

They are fixing 2 different bugs, so they are irrelated, but unfortunately conflict in
the code due to Miao's first patch which does code restructuring.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/