Re: Missing patch from stable [3/7]

[Miklos Szeredi]

On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:29 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> Well, you know the implications of leaving these known bugs open more than
> me. If you think some of them are really not needed, I'm fine with this,
> but some definitely fix real bugs (judging by the code and the comments).

Yeah.  Perhaps there should also be a rule, that -stable patches for
EXPERIMENTAL stuff (like ecryptfs) are automatically rejected.  And then
they wouldn't increase the workload for the people collecting/reviewing
the stable series.

Thanks,
Miklos


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/