Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-rc: x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of __GFP_NORETRY

From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Tue Jun 10 2008 - 13:15:11 EST


On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:23 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Okay, so how about this then ?
> > >
> > > applied to tip/pci-for-jesse for more testing. Thanks,
> >
> > I've thought about it a bit more, and I think the actual patch that
> > really does what everybody wants is this one instead:
>
> applied a delta patch version of the one below to tip/pci-for-jesse.

Speaking of that branch, how do you want to handle it? Is it intended for my
linux-next branch or are some of the fixes important to get upstream now?
Which branch should I diff/log against to see the changes (last time I looked
it appeared neither master nor tip were the correct ones...)

Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/