Re: [patch 02/41] cpu alloc: The allocator

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tue Jun 10 2008 - 14:28:21 EST


On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Well, MODULE is not CONFIG_MODULES :)
>
> If compiling an object that is going to be statically linked to kernel, MODULE
> is not defined, so we have shared objects.
>
> When compiling a module, we cannot *yet* use .data.percpu.shared_aligned
> section, since module loader wont handle this section.
>
> Alternative is to change modules linking for all arches to merge
> .data.percpu{*} subsections correctly, or tell module loader to take into
> account all .data.percpu sections.
>
> AFAIK no module uses DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() yet...

Ahhh. Makes sense. Add a comment to explain this?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/