Re: CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK omits size-4096 and larger?

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 05:46:13PM -0500, Weathers, Norman R. wrote:
> I will try and get it patched and retested, but it may be a day or two
> before I can get back the information due to production jobs now
> running.  Once they finish up, I will get back with the info.

Understood.

> Thanks everyone for looking at this, by the way!

And thanks for your persistence.

--b.

> 
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> > index 06236e4..b379e31 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.c
> > +++ b/mm/slab.c
> > @@ -2202,7 +2202,7 @@ kmem_cache_create (const char *name, 
> > size_t size, size_t align,
> >  	 * above the next power of two: caches with object 
> > sizes just above a
> >  	 * power of two have a significant amount of internal 
> > fragmentation.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (size < 4096 || fls(size - 1) == fls(size-1 + REDZONE_ALIGN +
> > +	if (size < 8192 || fls(size - 1) == fls(size-1 + REDZONE_ALIGN +
> >  						2 * 
> > sizeof(unsigned long long)))
> >  		flags |= SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER;
> >  	if (!(flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU))
> > 
> 
> 
> Norman Weathers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/