Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: minor PAT adaptations

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Jun 12 2008 - 06:58:07 EST



* Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > patch 5 - slightly changing the code that is doing the intersection of
> > > pat_type and mtrr_type to be more readable (from my point of view)
> > >
> > > Patches are against x86/pat (as of version
> > > v2.6.26-rc3-6-g46dd98a).
> >
> > #5 makes sense too, but it didnt apply cleanly:
>
> That's odd. I've double checked it by doing a fresh
>
> $ git remote add tip git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
> $ git remote update
> $ git checkout tip/x86/pat
>
> and applying patches 1-5 in sequence without problems.
> (Patches were taken from emails that arrived via my linux-kernel
> subscription.) Probably your tip/x86/pat is not at
> v2.6.26-rc3-6-g46dd98a?

it was there - but some other commit from upstream interfered.

> When trying to apply the patches to tip/master I get rejects for
> patches 3 and 5.
>
> Hence I think creating my patches against a feature branch was not a
> good idea.

it was a good idea - as that the final destination where the PAT patches
end up.

current tip/x86/pat head is:

tip/x86/pat 499f8f8: x86: rename pat_wc_enabled to pat_enabled

> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> >
> > (it didnt apply neither against tip/x86/pat or tip/master, nor against
> > linus/master. I guess it's some mixup somewhere.)
>
> Ok, it's commit 282c454cd3a7041f59a37112bb2f82263bc38f6c which was not
> contained in the tip/x86/pat branch. This means I have to adapt patch
> 5.

indeed. I cherry-picked this commit meanwhile into x86/pat.

> Finally a dumb question. What patches do you prefer? Patches against
> feature branches (say tip/x86/foo), against tip/master or against
> tip/auto-latest as described in your tip.git-Readme?

either is fine - but if you make specific topic updates it's best to do
them against the topic branch and we'll integrate them all together. If
in doubt, using tip/master doesnt hurt.

usually i do this: i update x86/pat, then i switch to 'master' and check
whether it all merges cleanly via 'git-merge x86/pat'.

when you switch to a topic branch, you might also want to update to the
latest linus tree via 'git-merge linus/master', to pick up all other
fixes as well. The topic branches always merge cleanly to linus-latest.
(we automate that - the x86/pat topic branch is not stale as its -rc3
base would suggest, there simply was no need to merge it to Linus-latest
up to now)

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/