Re: [PATCH -mm 14/24] Ramfs and Ram Disk pages are unevictable

[Nick Piggin]

On Friday 13 June 2008 03:50, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:37:56 +1000
>
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > This isn't the case for brd any longer. It doesn't use the buffer
> > > > cache as its backing store, so the buffer cache is reclaimable.
> > >
> > > I know that pages of files that got paged into the page
> > > cache from the ramdisk can be evicted (back to the ram
> > > disk), but how do the brd pages themselves behave?
> >
> > They are not reclaimable. But they have nothing (directly) to do
> > with brd's i_mapping address space, nor are they put on any LRU
> > lists.
>
> Ahhhh, doh!
>
> I'm mailing Andrew a patch right now that undoes the
> brd.c part of patch 14/24. The ramdisk part is correct
> and should stay (afaict).

The ramfs part? Yes, that looks correct to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/