Re: [WATCHDOG] v2.6.26 hpwdt.c fixes

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Jun 18 2008 - 16:31:31 EST




On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Quite frankly, this is *not* the right thing to do either: the proper
> thing to do is to just move the low-level call into the "asm" statement,
> and leave all the function prologue/epilogue entirely to the compiler.

Something like the following.

AGAIN! This is totally untested. It's meant as an *example* of how to use
inline asm properly, not meant to necessarily work or do the right thing.
It may be buggy as hell, for all I know. And there are probably better
ways to do this.

(This one does just the 64-bit version, because it's a bit easier: the
32-bit version needs to probably do some of the loading and storing of
registers manually in the inline asm just to avoid running out of them,
since the register pressure is worse).

Linus

---
drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c | 50 +++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
index 2686f3e..028c957 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
@@ -336,39 +336,23 @@ static int __devinit detect_cru_service(void)
asmlinkage void asminline_call(struct cmn_registers *pi86Regs,
unsigned long *pRomEntry)
{
- asm("pushq %rbp \n\t"
- "movq %rsp, %rbp \n\t"
- "pushq %rax \n\t"
- "pushq %rbx \n\t"
- "pushq %rdx \n\t"
- "pushq %r12 \n\t"
- "pushq %r9 \n\t"
- "movq %rsi, %r12 \n\t"
- "movq %rdi, %r9 \n\t"
- "movl 4(%r9),%ebx \n\t"
- "movl 8(%r9),%ecx \n\t"
- "movl 12(%r9),%edx \n\t"
- "movl 16(%r9),%esi \n\t"
- "movl 20(%r9),%edi \n\t"
- "movl (%r9),%eax \n\t"
- "call *%r12 \n\t"
- "pushfq \n\t"
- "popq %r12 \n\t"
- "popfq \n\t"
- "movl %eax, (%r9) \n\t"
- "movl %ebx, 4(%r9) \n\t"
- "movl %ecx, 8(%r9) \n\t"
- "movl %edx, 12(%r9) \n\t"
- "movl %esi, 16(%r9) \n\t"
- "movl %edi, 20(%r9) \n\t"
- "movq %r12, %rax \n\t"
- "movl %eax, 28(%r9) \n\t"
- "popq %r9 \n\t"
- "popq %r12 \n\t"
- "popq %rdx \n\t"
- "popq %rbx \n\t"
- "popq %rax \n\t"
- "leave \n\t" "ret");
+ asm("pushq %0 ; popfq ; call *%6; pushfq; popfq %0"
+ :"=r" (pi86Regs->reflags),
+ "=a" (pi86Regs->u1.reax),
+ "=b" (pi86Regs->u2.rebx),
+ "=c" (pi86Regs->u3.recx),
+ "=d" (pi86Regs->u4.redx),
+ "=S" (pi86Regs->resi),
+ "=D" (pi86Regs->redi)
+ :"r" (pRomEntry),
+ "0" (pi86Regs->reflags),
+ "1" (pi86Regs->u1.reax),
+ "2" (pi86Regs->u2.rebx),
+ "3" (pi86Regs->u3.recx),
+ "4" (pi86Regs->u4.redx),
+ "5" (pi86Regs->resi),
+ "6" (pi86Regs->redi)
+ :"cc", "memory");
}

/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/