Re: [rfc patch 3/4] splice: remove confirm from pipe_buf_operations

[Miklos Szeredi]

> > > basically like PageWriteback(), but for read-in.
> > 
> > OK it could be done, possibly at great pain.  But why is it important?
> 
> Maybe not that great if mark all readahead pages as, well, readahead,
> and do the same for readpage (essnetially it is the same).

It isn't that easy.  Readahead (->readpages()) is best effort, and is
allowed to not bring the page uptodate, since it will be retried with
->readpage().  I don't know whether any filesystems actually do that,
but it's allowed nonetheless.

> > What's the use case where it matters that splice-in should not block
> > on the read?
> 
> To be able to transfer what was already read?

That needs the consumer to be non-blocking...

Umm, one more reason why the ->confirm() stuff is currently busted:
pipe_read() will block on such a buffer even if pipe file is marked
O_NONBLOCK.  Fixing that would take a hell of a lot of added
complexity in pipe_poll(), etc...

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/