Re: [PATCH] fix to putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Tue Jun 24 2008 - 13:36:01 EST


> 'lru' was not being set to 'UNEVICTABLE when page was, in fact,
> unevictable [really "nonreclaimable" :-)], so retry would never
> happen, and culled pages never counted.
>
> Also, redundant mem_cgroup_move_lists()--one with incorrect 'lru',
> in the case of unevictable pages--messes up memcontroller tracking [I think].

indeed.
sorry, I forgot to send this fix.

Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

but I still happend panic on usex and nishimura-san's cpuset migration test.
-> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=121375647720110&w=2


I'll investigate it tommorow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/