On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:18:09PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:XFS shows 2 build problems today.
1. xfs_stats.h problem
CC fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o
In file included from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:91,
from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs.h:44,
from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c:18:
/local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h: In function 'xfs_init_procfs':
/local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h:150: error: expected ';' before '}' token
make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o] Error 1
This will be a !CONFIG_PROC_FS change.
Lachlan/Niv - This is the guilty party:
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/xfs-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e0fe783155e4f1c7106f3579c258b9f995330c19
The commit log is:
[XFS]
SGI-PV: 111111
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31210a
Signed-off-by: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
---
What the hell happened here? Where's the commit title, description
so this can be tracked back to a real patch? That PV# is also bogus....
I suspect that it is this patch:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00322.html
Which means that the Signed-Off-By list is incorrect as well as the original
patch came from Christoph. This can't go to mainline like this - the commit log
needs to be fixed up.
--
2. ACL's undefined
CC fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.o
/local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c: In function 'xfs_decode_acl':
/local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: '_ACL_TYPE_ACCESS' undeclared (first use in this function)
/local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: for each function it appears in.)
/local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:42: error: '_ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.o] Error 1
And this will be a !CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL build, I think.
Christoph - this is part of your change to use the generic ACL stuff,
can you have a look?
Cheers,
Dave.