Re: kmap_atomic_pfn for PCI BAR access?

[Dave Airlie]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keith Packard wrote:
>>
>> The graphics memory BAR is generally fairly good sized; on Intel chips,
>> it's between 256M and 1G (and growing). I want to write data into this
>> region from kernel space, but it's really too big to map the whole thing
>> into kernel address space, especially on 32-bit systems. ioremap is not
>> a good option here -- it's way too slow.
>>
>> With CONFIG_HIGHMEM enabled, I can use kmap_atomic_pfn (well, actually
>> the kmap_atomic_proc_pfn included in the DRM tree) and things work quite
>> well -- performance is good, with barely any measurable time spent in
>> the PTE whacking (~1%).
>>
>> However, with CONFIG_HIGHMEM disabled, there aren't any PTEs reserved
>> for this kind of mapping fun. This makes me suspect that abusing
>> kmap_atomic for this operation would not be appreciated.
>> Should I use kmap_atomic_pfn to reach my PCI BAR like this?
>>
>> Would it be reasonable to supply a patch that made this work even
>> without CONFIG_HIGHMEM?
>>
>
> Usually people use ioremap to map device memory.  Wouldn't that work in this
> case?
>

"but it's really too big to map the whole thing
into kernel address space, especially on 32-bit systems. ioremap is not
a good option here -- it's way too slow."

>From the original mail.

doing tlb flush for iounmap is slow as all hell if you do it a lot,
and we can't afford to mmap the whole aperture it can 1GB.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/