Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86 boot: add E820_RESVD_KERN

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Fri Jun 27 2008 - 18:06:30 EST


On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Huang, Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 19:22 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Huang, Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 00:25 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>> > if (pfn >= limit_pfn)
>> >>> > @@ -977,7 +978,7 @@ u64 __init early_reserve_e820(u64 startt
>> >>> > return 0;
>> >>> >
>> >>> > addr = round_down(start + size - sizet, align);
>> >>> > - e820_update_range(addr, sizet, E820_RAM, E820_RESERVED);
>> >>> > + e820_update_range(addr, sizet, E820_RAM, E820_RESVD_KERN);
>> >>>
>> >>> this line is not needed.
>> >>
>> >> Why? Memory reserved by early_rserved_e820 should not be saved during
>> >> hibernation? shoudl not be saved by kdump?
>> >>
>
> Can you tell me why this line is not needed?
>
> [...]
>> some like the attach patch...
>>
>> you still can merge parse_setup_data parse_e820_ext
>> also entries in parse_e820_ext is not initialized..., __copy_e820_map
>> will do nothing.
>
> ïOK. Because some E820 entries are available after parse_setup_data(),
> it is better to call reserve_setup_data() after calling
> parse_setup_data() if update_e820_range() is used instead of
> reserve_early().

please modify it and test on your platforms then submit to Ingo..

Thanks

YH
¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶Ÿÿà -»+ƒùdš_