Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks

[Rusty Russell]

On Tuesday 08 July 2008 05:07:49 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> At the most recent Xen Summit, Thomas Friebel presented a paper
> ("Preventing Guests from Spinning Around",
> http://xen.org/files/xensummitboston08/LHP.pdf) investigating the
> interactions between spinlocks and virtual machines.  Specifically, he
> looked at what happens when a lock-holding VCPU gets involuntarily
> preempted.

I find it interesting that gang scheduling the guest was not suggested as an 
obvious solution.

Anyway, concept looks fine; lguest's solution is more elegant of course :)

A little disappointing that you can't patch your version inline.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/