Re: [patch 04/15] LTTng instrumentation - irq

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Wed Jul 09 2008 - 12:41:36 EST


Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Instrumentation of IRQ related events : irq, softirq, tasklet entry and exit and
> softirq "raise" events.
>
> It allows tracers to perform latency analysis on those various types of
> interrupts and to detect interrupts with max/min/avg duration. It helps
> detecting driver or hardware problems which cause an ISR to take ages to
> execute. It has been shown to be the case with bogus hardware causing an mmio
> read to take a few milliseconds.
>
> Those tracepoints are used by LTTng.
>
> About the performance impact of tracepoints (which is comparable to markers),
> even without immediate values optimizations, tests done by Hideo Aoki on ia64
> show no regression. His test case was using hackbench on a kernel where
> scheduler instrumentation (about 5 events in code scheduler code) was added.
> See the "Tracepoints" patch header for performance result detail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: 'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> CC: 'Hideo AOKI' <haoki@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/irq-trace.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/irq/handle.c | 6 ++++++
> kernel/softirq.c | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/irq/handle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c 2008-07-09 10:57:33.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/irq/handle.c 2008-07-09 10:57:35.000000000 -0400
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> +#include "../irq-trace.h"
>
> #include "internals.h"
>
> @@ -130,6 +131,9 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned in
> {
> irqreturn_t ret, retval = IRQ_NONE;
> unsigned int status = 0;
> + struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
> +
> + trace_irq_entry(irq, regs);
>
> handle_dynamic_tick(action);
>
> @@ -148,6 +152,8 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned in
> add_interrupt_randomness(irq);
> local_irq_disable();
>
> + trace_irq_exit();
> +

Hi Mathieu,
What would you think tracing return value of irq handlers here?
like:
trace_irq_exit(retval);

So, we can check the irq was handled correctly or not.

Thank you,


--
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/