Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at000000000000000e (reset_prng_context)
From: Joe Perches
Date: Wed Jul 16 2008 - 13:13:19 EST
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 01:49 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:44:07PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > > Note that the new crypto/prng.c driver has very bad quality:
> > I think we should merge new drivers as aggressively as possible.
> Well, I don't have strong opinion about this exact statement, but
> Ingo, COULD YOU PLEASE [...] STOP THIS
> CHECKPATCH.PL-AS-INDICATOR HORSESHIT !
Coding style conformity (easy and clinical) and quality
(hard and emotional) are only weakly correlated in software.
I think that Ingo sometimes conflates them and he should be more
selective when using the "quality" term.
I think he recognizes this, he just hasn't done much about it.
Ingo, could you please just substitute conformity for quality
in these sorts of posts? Perhaps you could also change the
name of your code-quality script to style-conformity?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/