Re: [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched: Introduce cpu_active_map and redoscheddomain managment (take 2)

From: Max Krasnyansky
Date: Thu Jul 17 2008 - 03:17:20 EST




Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Well, admittedly I am not entirely clear on what problem is being solved as
> I was not part of the original thread with Linus. My impression of what you
> were trying to solve was to eliminate the need to rebuild the domains for a
> hotplug event (which I think is a good problem to solve), thus eliminating
> some complexity and (iiuc) races there.
>
> However, based on what you just said, I am not sure I've got that entirely
> right anymore. Can you clarify the intent (or point me at the original thread)
> so we are on the same page?
Here is the link to the original thread
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/11/328
And here is where Linus explained the idea
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/12/137

I'll reply to the rest of your email tomorrow (can't keep my yes open any
longer :)).

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/