Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset: fix wrong calculation of relax domain level
From: Hidetoshi Seto
Date: Thu Jul 17 2008 - 04:59:24 EST
Li Zefan wrote:
> When multiple cpusets are overlapping in their 'cpus' and hence they
> form a single sched domain, the largest sched_relax_domain_level among
> those should be used. But when top_cpuset's sched_load_balance is
> set, its sched_relax_domain_level is used regardless other sub-cpusets'.
> There are several proposals to solve this:
> 1) Travel the cpuset hierarchy to find the largest relax_domain_level
> in rebuild_sched_domains(). But cpuset avoids hierarchy travelling
> when top_cpuset.sched_load_balance is set.
> 2) Remember the largest relax_domain_level when we update a cpuset's
> sched_load_balance, sched_relax_domain_level and cpus. This should
> work, but seems a bit tricky and a bit ugly. (As this patch shows)
> 3) Don't treat this as a bug, but document this behavior.
I think 1) is correct way.
There was a special short path for the top_cpuset's case, but now it is
disappeared. I think there are no need to treat the top_cpuset as VIP,
so 2) is excessive nurturing.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/