Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Thu Jul 17 2008 - 13:52:47 EST

"Daniel Hokka Zakrisson" <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
>>> While moving Linux-VServer to using pid namespaces, I noticed that
>>> kill(-1) from inside a pid namespace is currently signalling every
>>> process in the entire system, including processes that are otherwise
>>> unreachable from the current process.
>> This is not a "news" actually, buy anyway - thanks :)
> And yet nobody's fixed it... Kind of a critical thing, if you actually
> want to use them, since most distribution's rc-scripts do a kill(-1,
> SIGTERM), followed by kill(-1, SIGKILL) when halting (which, needless to
> say, would be very bad).
>>> This patch fixes it by making sure that only processes which are in
>>> the same pid namespace as current get signalled.
>> This is to be done, indeed, but I do not like the proposed implementation,
>> since you have to walk all the tasks in the system (under tasklist_lock,
>> by the way) to search for a couple of interesting ones. Better look at how
>> zap_pid_ns_processes works (by the way - I saw some patch doing so some
>> time ago).
> The way zap_pid_ns_processes does it is worse, since it signals every
> thread in the namespace rather than every thread group. So either we walk
> the global tasklist, or we create a per-namespace one. Is that what we
> want?

Can you please introduce kill_pidns_info and have both
kill_something_info and zap_pid_ns_processes call this common

We want to walk the set of all pids in a pid namespace. /proc does
this and it is the recommended idiom. If walking all of the pids in a
pid namespace is not fast enough we can accelerate that.

You are correct signalling every thread in a namespace is worse, in
fact it is semantically incorrect. zap_pid_ns_processes gets away
with it because it is sending SIGKILL. Therefore kill_pidns_info
should skip sending a signal to every task that is not the

We need to hold the tasklist_lock to prevent new processes from
joining the list of all processes. Otherwise we could run the code
under the rcu_read_lock.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at