Re: [patch -mmotm 2/6] fixqla2xxx-use-memory_read_from_buffer.patch
From: Andrew Vasquez
Date: Thu Jul 17 2008 - 19:44:39 EST
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> > > Now memory_read_from_buffer() belongs in string.h
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Andrew Vasquez <linux-driver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Seokmann Ju <seokmann.ju@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > If needed:
> > Acked-by: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks. So we now have tested-by:you and acked-by:you. That'll do ;)
> > BTW: is the memory_read_from_buffer() work for qla2xxx going in
> > through the mm tree submission path???
> FSVO "through", yeah. It's appeared on linux-scsi four times so far.
> Last time James complained about the fs.h inclusion so Akinobu raised a
> patch "move memory_read_from_buffer() from fs.h to string.h" which I
> just merged.
> I'll just keep pressing send - it'll get there sometime. Or you can
> merge it if you like.
Would it too bothersome if I were to just collapse the two patches and
submit the composite with the my next set of patches??? Seems silly
to add the oneliner to the history...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/