Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Jul 18 2008 - 18:19:28 EST

* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ...
> >
> > in hindsight core/percpu indeed looks unfinished and direction-less
> > without core/percpu-zerobased - but the latter is not stable yet.
> >
> > Ingo
> Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4. The earlier problems came
> about using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went
> wrong. (And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.)

well, the crash report i gave you was with gcc-4.2.3. Or is that one

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at