Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27

From: Mike Travis
Date: Fri Jul 18 2008 - 18:54:19 EST

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> ...
>>> in hindsight core/percpu indeed looks unfinished and direction-less
>>> without core/percpu-zerobased - but the latter is not stable yet.
>>> Ingo
>> Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4. The earlier problems came
>> about using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went
>> wrong. (And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.)
> well, the crash report i gave you was with gcc-4.2.3. Or is that one
> resolved?
> Ingo

I will test with gcc-4.2.3 as soon as I'm able, and will let you know.
(There have been changes from when you hit the panic.)

I will resubmit against tip/master.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at