Re: [PATCH] replace CONFIG_IOMMU with CONFIG_GART_IOMMU in iommu.h
From: FUJITA Tomonori
Date: Sat Jul 19 2008 - 09:18:01 EST
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:49:13 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 09:12:56PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > I think that we need a common header file (iommu.h or whatever) for
> > what everyone needs, pci_iommu_shutdown(), no_iommu_init(), etc.
> > Anyway, I did more cleanups:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/10/510
> > or
> > tip/x86/gart
> > Let me know if you think we still need cleanups.
> Now that you ask, I think the x86 DMA layer in general needs some rework
> and cleanup.
Agreed, I think that every IOMMU developer agrees :)
> The implementation specific free_coherent function is never
> called at the moment for example.
Right, x86 coherent functions need to be fixed. There are some other
areas to improve, I think.
> For paravirtualized DMA we also need
> some kind of stackable dma_ops according to Amit.
Yeah, we need that:
I think that we will need lots of IOMMU (and DMA stuff) work in the
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/