Re: [PATCH 0/2] Migrate data off physical pages with corrected memory errors (Version 7)
From: Russ Anderson
Date: Sun Jul 20 2008 - 13:50:21 EST
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 06:13:28AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:37:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Russ Anderson <rja@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > > [PATCH 0/2] Migrate data off physical pages with corrected memory errors (Version 7)
> > FWIW I discussed this with some hardware people and the general
> > opinion was that it was way too aggressive to disable a page on the
> > first corrected error like this patchkit currently does.
> I think it's reasonable to take a page out of service on the first error.
> Then a user program needs to be notified of which bit is suspected.
> It can then subject that page to an intense set of tests (I'd start
> by stealing the ones from memtest86+) and if no more errors are found,
> it could return the page to service.
In general I agree with that approach. One concern is that in the
process of testing the memory the diagnostic may hit an uncorrectable
error. That is not a problem with Itanium, which is designed to handle
uncorrected/poisoned data going into and out of the processor core, but
can be a system fatal error (requiring a reboot) on other processor types.
Just something to be aware of.
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/