Re: [PATCH] x86: more header fixes
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Jul 22 2008 - 06:37:07 EST
* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I'm not sure how we should proceed with this. On one hand, we could
> >> just fix the issues as they come up and be done with it. On the other
> >> hand, this was exactly the thing I wanted to avoid by automatic it. I
> >> guess it can never be fully automated... The question is if there is
> >> any danger of *silent* (read: runtime) breakage, which would be much
> >> worse than compiler errors.
> > dont worry, lets fix the above hideous hack first, then i can merge the
> > guards fixes ontop of that fix. That's why we do testing, to catch the
> > cases where assumptions fail. Your script is just fine - it beats having
> > to edit 280+ files by hand ...
> I've updated my script to also fix any rogue uses of header-guard
> names in auxiliary files. I'm attaching the resulting patch.
> It doesn't really _fix_ the hideous hack, it merely unbreaks it.
> Patch #2 also fixes some left-over headers. They both apply on top of
looks good - do you have a branch i could pull into
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/