[PATCH 08/24] OProfile: Moving increment_tail() in buffer_sync.c

[Robert Richter]

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c |   24 +++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c b/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
index 69a7327..615929f 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
@@ -268,6 +268,17 @@ lookup_dcookie(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, off_t *offset)
 	return cookie;
 }
 
+static void increment_tail(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
+{
+	unsigned long new_tail = b->tail_pos + 1;
+
+	rmb();
+
+	if (new_tail < b->buffer_size)
+		b->tail_pos = new_tail;
+	else
+		b->tail_pos = 0;
+}
 
 static unsigned long last_cookie = INVALID_COOKIE;
 
@@ -417,19 +428,6 @@ static unsigned long get_slots(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
 }
 
 
-static void increment_tail(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
-{
-	unsigned long new_tail = b->tail_pos + 1;
-
-	rmb();
-
-	if (new_tail < b->buffer_size)
-		b->tail_pos = new_tail;
-	else
-		b->tail_pos = 0;
-}
-
-
 /* Move tasks along towards death. Any tasks on dead_tasks
  * will definitely have no remaining references in any
  * CPU buffers at this point, because we use two lists,
-- 
1.5.5.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/