Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] kmemtrace: Core implementation.
From: Frank Ch. Eigler
Date: Tue Jul 22 2008 - 21:28:43 EST
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:50:02AM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> [...] Sounds like a good idea, but I'd like to get rid of markers
> and use Mathieu Desnoyers' tracepoints instead. I'm just waiting for
> tracepoints to get closer to inclusion in mainline/-mm.
> It would be great if tracepoints completely replaced markers, so
> SystemTap would use those instead.
Raw tracepoints are problematic as they require a per-tracepoint C
function signature to be synthesized by the tool (or hard-coded in the
tool or elsewhere). We haven't worked out how best do to this. OTOH,
markers don't require such hard-coding, so are simpler for a general
tool to interface to.
> However, if tracepoints are not ready when kmemtrace is to be merged,
> I'll take your advice and mention markers and SystemTap.
Thanks either way - I'm glad you found an existing tracing mechanism
usable and didn't choose/need to invent your own.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/