Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27

From: Mike Travis
Date: Fri Jul 25 2008 - 11:19:06 EST


Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>> in hindsight core/percpu indeed looks unfinished and direction-less
>>> without core/percpu-zerobased - but the latter is not stable yet.
>>>
>>> Ingo
>> Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4. The earlier problems came
>> about using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went
>> wrong. (And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.)
>
> well, the crash report i gave you was with gcc-4.2.3. Or is that one
> resolved?
>
> Ingo

YES! Patcheset to follow... ;-)

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/