Re: [rfc git pull] cpus4096 fixes, take 2

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Tue Jul 29 2008 - 21:37:37 EST


On Tuesday 29 July 2008 22:11:56 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> But gcc 3.4.5 apparently craps out on this valid use of a gcc extension,
> see the report and the fix at:

Hmm. I can't find anything in the docs, but I'd assumed that a statement
expression isn't an lvalue. Trying "int x; &({ x; });" fails as expected
with gcc 3.4, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3:

foo.c:3: error: lvalue required as unary â&â operand

I'd say your code should, too...

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/