Re: [BUG] wireless : cpu stuck for 61s

[Dave Young]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Pekka J Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > Ok here it is.
>> > BTW, I run "klogd -c 7" after boot
>>
>> The sysrq output is still missing lots of stuff.  I guess we broke it.
>>
>> >
>> > This time I get a kmalloc poison overwritten:
>> >
>>
>> argh, that stuff hurts my brain.  None of the numbers seem to make any
>> sense for a 4k allocation :( Pekka, do you have time to decrypt this?
>
> Sure. Here goes:
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> <fixes wordwrapping, cleans stuff up>
>>
>> =============================================================================
>> BUG kmalloc-4096: Poison overwritten
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> INFO: 0xf6f3a080-0xf6f3a0ef. First byte 0x80 instead of 0x6b
>
> That's POISON_FREE ("0x6b") overwritten which means use-after-free for
> the range of 0xf6f3a080 - 0xf6f3a0ef (112 bytes). The rest of the
> object is okay but the SLUB debugging code only dumps the first 128 bytes
> of the object which is why we don't see the full corruption.
>
> 2.6.27-rc1 should dump the full object so I'm assuming this is pre -rc1?

Yes, it's 2.6.26

>
>> INFO: Allocated in dev_alloc_skb+0x1c/0x30 age=3642 cpu=0 pid=0
>> INFO: Freed in skb_release_data+0x57/0x80 age=3146 cpu=0 pid=2398
>
> So the corrupted object was free'd by skb_release_data() so we need to
> look for a driver or the networking stack calling that function too early.
>
>> INFO: Slab 0xc1c05440 objects=7 used=3 fp=0xf6f3a060 flags=0x400020c3
>> INFO: Object 0xf6f3a060 @offset=8288 fp=0xf6f39030
>>
>> Bytes b4 0xf6f3a050:  5e 09 00 00 57 c9 05 00 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ^...WÃ..ZZZZZZZZ
>
> The object starts here (the poison values for first 32 bytes are okay):
>
>> Object 0xf6f3a060:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
>> Object 0xf6f3a070:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
>
> And here are the first 96 bytes of the corruption:
>
>> Object 0xf6f3a080:  80 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 17 7b 00 46 40 ....ÃÃÃÃÃÃ..{.F@
>> Object 0xf6f3a090:  00 17 7b 00 46 40 30 09 81 21 08 7a 21 00 00 00 ..{.F@xxx!.z!...
>> Object 0xf6f3a0a0:  64 00 21 04 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 08 82 d.!.............
>> Object 0xf6f3a0b0:  84 8b 0c 12 96 18 24 03 01 01 05 04 00 02 00 00 ......$.........
>> Object 0xf6f3a0c0:  07 06 43 4e 20 01 0d 14 2a 01 00 32 04 30 48 60 ..CN....*..2.0H`
>> Object 0xf6f3a0d0:  6c dd 18 00 17 7b 01 04 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 10 lÃ...{..........
>
> But I think that's just the payload of a SKB?
>
>> Redzone 0xf6f3b060:  bb bb bb bb                                     ÂÂÂÂ
>
> The red-zone has SLUB_RED_INACTIVE ("0xbb") which reinforces
> use-after-free.
>
>> Padding 0xf6f3b088:  5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a                         ZZZZZZZZ
>> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G        W 2.6.26-smp #2
>> [<c0180f5d>] print_trailer+0xad/0xf0
>> [<c018103b>] check_bytes_and_report+0x9b/0xc0
>> [<c018145e>] check_object+0x19e/0x1e0
>> [<c01821a4>] __slab_alloc+0x454/0x4f0
>> [<c01834d6>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0xe6/0xf0
>> [<c03dd1ec>] ? dev_alloc_skb+0x1c/0x30
>> [<c03dd1ec>] ? dev_alloc_skb+0x1c/0x30
>> [<c03dce79>] __alloc_skb+0x49/0x100
>> [<c03dd1ec>] dev_alloc_skb+0x1c/0x30
>> [<f8a58599>] ath5k_rxbuf_setup+0x39/0x200 [ath5k]
>> [<f8a5a697>] ath5k_tasklet_rx+0x127/0x5c0 [ath5k]
>> [<c014969a>] ? print_lock_contention_bug+0x1a/0xe0
>> [<c012eafc>] tasklet_action+0x4c/0xc0
>> [<c012e463>] __do_softirq+0x93/0x120
>> [<c012e547>] do_softirq+0x57/0x60
>> [<c012ea29>] irq_exit+0x69/0x80
>> [<c0106b55>] do_IRQ+0x45/0x80
>> [<c010a5d0>] ? mwait_idle+0x0/0x50
>> [<c0104752>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
>> [<c010a5d0>] ? mwait_idle+0x0/0x50
>> [<c010a609>] ? mwait_idle+0x39/0x50
>> [<c01026e0>] cpu_idle+0x60/0xd0
>> [<c043c8ce>] rest_init+0x4e/0x60
>> =======================
>> FIX kmalloc-4096: Restoring 0xf6f3a080-0xf6f3a0ef=0x6b
>>
>> FIX kmalloc-4096: Marking all objects used
>> [<c0243b4f>] ? security_file_permission+0xf/0x20
>> [<c019436f>] sys_select+0x3f/0x190
>> [<c01878e9>] ? fput+0x19/0x20
>> [<c0103dbf>] ? restore_nocheck+0x12/0x15
>> [<c014b06d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xbd/0x140
>> [<c0103d5e>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>> =======================
>>
>> Dave, could you please remind us which net driver was in use here?
>
> There's ath5k in the stack trace but that, of course, doesn't
> automatically mean it's at fault here. It could have been just the poor
> bastard who was the next to allocate 4 KB with kmalloc() noticing the
> corruption.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
>                        Pekka

Lockdep helped me, this morning I get a lockdep warning about this,

[  171.432140] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  171.433113] 2.6.27-rc1-smp #4
[  171.434079] ---------------------------------------------
[  171.435039] ath5k_pci/2447 is trying to acquire lock:
[  171.435990]  (&sc->lock){--..}, at: [<f89ee9b5>]
ath5k_config_interface+0xd5/0x340 [ath5k]
[  171.437046]
[  171.437048] but task is already holding lock:
[  171.438903]  (&sc->lock){--..}, at: [<f89ee91d>]
ath5k_config_interface+0x3d/0x340 [ath5k]
[  171.439953]
[  171.439954] other info that might help us debug this:
[  171.441795] 3 locks held by ath5k_pci/2447:
[  171.442729]  #0:  ((name)){--..}, at: [<c013a122>] run_workqueue+0x102/0x1d0
[  171.443800]  #1:  (&(&local->scan_work)->work){--..}, at:
[<c013a122>] run_workqueue+0x102/0x1d0
[  171.444859]  #2:  (&sc->lock){--..}, at: [<f89ee91d>]
ath5k_config_interface+0x3d/0x340 [ath5k]

Deadlock happen here, I remove the lock in the sub routine, tested and
fixed the problem for me.
I will send the patch after a while.

But I still have no idea with the poison overwritten.

-- 
Regards
dave
¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ŸÿÃ-»+ƒùdš_