Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finishedmaking slub perform as well

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Mon Aug 04 2008 - 17:26:32 EST


Rene Herman wrote:
On 03-08-08 23:25, Pekka Enberg wrote:

Matthew Wilcox wrote:

Do we have to once again explain that slab still outperforms slub on at
least one important benchmark? I hope Nick Piggin finds time to finish
tuning slqb; it already outperforms slub.

No, you don't have to. I haven't merged that patch nor do I intend to do so until the regressions are fixed.

And yes, I'm still waiting to hear from you how we're now doing with higher order page allocations...

General interested question -- I recently "accidentally" read some of slub and I believe that it doesn't feature the cache colouring support that slab did? Is that true, and if so, wasn't it needed/useful?

I don't know why Christoph decided not to implement it. Christoph?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/