Re: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?

From: Robert P. J. Day
Date: Wed Aug 06 2008 - 18:21:41 EST


On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rene Herman wrote:

> On 06-08-08 00:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
> >
> > #define INITCALLS \
> > *(.initcallearly.init) \
> > VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .; \
> > *(.initcall0.init) \
> > *(.initcall0s.init) \
> > *(.initcall1.init) \
> > *(.initcall1s.init) \
> > ... etc ...
> >
> > but from include/linux/init.h:
> >
> > #define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
> >
> > #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
> > #define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
> > #define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
> > #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
> >
> > i don't see any initcalls of level "0s". in any event, might it not
> > be cleaner to have these files sync up? no big deal, of course. i'm
> > well aware that it doesn't break anything.
>
> Last I heard, all sync levels were on their way out (Arjan).

ah, i was unaware of that, thanks.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/