On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
and at this point it is equal NR_IRQSThis patch is ok, but this approach is fundamentally broken.
Only 19 architectures use GENERIC_HARDIRQS
The only required interface is interrupt.h not irq.h
So you may not replace NR_IRQS with nr_irqs in anything other
then genirq code and some architecture code.
Doing so will break the build on several architectures.
some platforms will not use include/linux/irq.h and kernel/irq/handle.c ?