Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig

From: Robert P. J. Day
Date: Sat Aug 09 2008 - 06:42:15 EST


On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Alan Cox wrote:

> > I would also ask for PATA and for SATA first:
> > >
> > > [*] PATA support
> > > [*] SATA support
> >
> > that was sort my original thought, but i don't know enough about ATA
> > fundamentals to know if it makes sense for these to be independently
> > selectable.
>
> Alas it does not or we would have done so. A lot of the chips have
> things like 'two SATA one PATA' and some of them have SATA and PATA
> variants of the same chip. Then we have generic drivers like
> ata_generic which really don't care if its SATA or PATA ..

at this point, i'll back away slowly and leave it for someone way
smarter than me to decide on. at the very least, most of those
EXPERIMENTAL tags can be heaved over the side.

rday
--


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/