Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Aug 11 2008 - 08:37:52 EST
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I personally prefer this printk_tick() driven one over the RCU
> > driven one because it doesn't trade deadlocks.
>
> i've started testing it in tip/core/printk to give it some track
> record - thanks Peter.
small build fixlet below.
Ingo
-------------->