Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i: cxgb3 iSCSI initiator

[Roland Dreier]

 > Why show these special connections if the user cannot interact with or
 > shape the stream at all like normal ones?

So that an admin can see what connections are open, so that the stack
doesn't try to reuse the same 4-tuple for another connection, etc, etc.

 > And I even wonder, these days, if you probably get %90 or more of the
 > gain these "optimized" iSCSI connections obtain from things like LRO.

Yes, that's the question -- are stateless offloads (plus CRC32C in the
CPU etc) going to give good enough performance that the whole TCP
offload exercise is pointless?  The only issue is that I don't see how
to avoid the fundamental 3X increase in memory bandwidth that is chewed
up if the NIC can't do direct placement.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/