[PATCH tip/cor/rcu] remove redundant ACCESS_ONCE definition fromrcupreempt.c

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Sun Aug 17 2008 - 15:50:47 EST


Remove the redundant definition of ACCESS_ONCE() from rcupreempt.c in
favor of the one in compiler.h. Also merge the comment header from
rcupreempt.c's definition into that in compiler.h.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

include/linux/compiler.h | 4 +++-
kernel/rcupreempt.c | 8 --------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index c8bd2da..8322141 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -190,7 +190,9 @@ extern void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *);
* ACCESS_ONCE() in different C statements.
*
* This macro does absolutely -nothing- to prevent the CPU from reordering,
- * merging, or refetching absolutely anything at any time.
+ * merging, or refetching absolutely anything at any time. Its main intended
+ * use is to mediate communication between process-level code and irq/NMI
+ * handlers, all running on the same CPU.
*/
#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))

diff --git a/kernel/rcupreempt.c b/kernel/rcupreempt.c
index 2782793..ca4bbbe 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupreempt.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupreempt.c
@@ -59,14 +59,6 @@
#include <linux/rcupreempt_trace.h>

/*
- * Macro that prevents the compiler from reordering accesses, but does
- * absolutely -nothing- to prevent CPUs from reordering. This is used
- * only to mediate communication between mainline code and hardware
- * interrupt and NMI handlers.
- */
-#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))
-
-/*
* PREEMPT_RCU data structures.
*/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/